Technopark Maroc at Emerging Valley 2024


I spoke at [Technopark Tanger](https://www.technopark.ma/) as a [Rising UP in Spain](https://www.investinspain.org/en/rising-up-in-spain) ambassador — ICEX’s programme for foreign founders who want to land a company in Spain. Martín Jerch from ICEX was on the same stage. The slide behind us said the same thing I came to say: Asturias is not a postcard. It is where Konfigear learned to scale.

[CEEI Asturias](https://www.ceei.es/) and the rest of that regional stack did not give us a logo to put on a deck. They gave us a place to hire, sell, and stay. That is the part I wanted people in the room to hear if they were still treating “Europe” as a single decision. A region that will sit with you on visas, customers, and the first awkward year is rarer than a grant.

<figure class="story-figure">
  <img src="/images/yassine-ait-oufkir-rising-up-spain-technopark-tangier.jpg" alt="Yassine Ait Oufkir speaking at Technopark Tangier as a Rising UP in Spain ambassador, with an Asturias Startup Paradise slide and ICEX banner behind him" width="1024" height="1024" loading="lazy" decoding="async" />
  <figcaption>Technopark Tanger — Rising UP in Spain, Asturias Startup Paradise. <a href="https://www.linkedin.com/posts/aitoufkiir_startupjourney-asturias-risingupspain-activity-7206717661156667392-jJy-" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">Original post on LinkedIn</a>.</figcaption>
</figure>

<figure class="story-figure">
  <img src="/images/rising-up-spain-asturias-startup-paradise-technopark-tangier.jpg" alt="Auditorium at Technopark Tangier during the Rising UP in Spain talk, with Asturias Startup Paradise on the projection screen" width="1024" height="1024" loading="lazy" decoding="async" />
  <figcaption>The room at Technopark Tanger.</figcaption>
</figure>

Thank you [ICEX](https://www.icex.es/) and Invest in Spain for the programme, and for asking founders who already made the move to go back and say so in public. If you have a startup and you are choosing a first European base, look at [Asturias](https://www.startinasturias.es/) before you look at the usual three cities.


Yassine Ait Oufkir speaking at Technopark Tangier as a Rising UP in Spain ambassador — how Asturias and ICEX helped scale Konfigear, with Martín Jerch from ICEX.

Rising Up Spain at Technopark Tangier


[South Summit](https://www.southsummit.co/) 2024 ran 5–7 June at La Nave in Madrid. I was there with Konfigear on two clocks at once: the stand, and a talk. The talk was the clearer of the two. Traditional online shopping still forces a customer to describe a product that does not exist yet. That is the problem on the slide. Configuration is the answer we sell.

The stand existed because [CEEI Asturias](https://www.ceei.es/) and [ASTUREX](https://www.asturex.org/) put the region in one room — Asturias Paraíso Startup — next to companies I would rather share a floor with than a keynote hall. People came to the booth. People came to the talk. That is the whole report.

<figure class="story-figure">
  <img src="/images/yassine-ait-oufkir-konfigear-south-summit-2024-madrid.jpg" alt="Yassine Ait Oufkir pitching Konfigear on the South Summit 2024 stage in Madrid, with Start in Asturias and CEEI Asturias on the screens" width="1024" height="682" loading="lazy" decoding="async" />
  <figcaption>South Summit 2024, La Nave — Konfigear on the Start in Asturias stage. <a href="https://www.linkedin.com/posts/aitoufkiir_configuraciaejn-personalizada-configuraciaejn-activity-7204903257788313601-6YkL" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">Original post on LinkedIn</a>.</figcaption>
</figure>

<figure class="story-figure">
  <img src="/images/yassine-ait-oufkir-south-summit-2024-la-nave-madrid.jpg" alt="Yassine Ait Oufkir at the South Summit 2024 entrance installation at La Nave, Madrid" width="1024" height="473" loading="lazy" decoding="async" />
  <figcaption>Outside La Nave, June 2024.</figcaption>
</figure>

<figure class="story-figure">
  <img src="/images/south-summit-2024-asturias-startup-paradise-delegation.jpg" alt="Asturias Startup Paradise delegation group photo at South Summit 2024 in Madrid, with CEEI Asturias and ASTUREX branding" width="1024" height="550" loading="lazy" decoding="async" />
  <figcaption>The Asturias delegation at stands 158–159.</figcaption>
</figure>

Three days is not enough to close anything serious. It is enough to find out who already understands why a product configurator is not a nicer product page. I will go back.


Yassine Ait Oufkir at South Summit 2024 in Madrid — pitching Konfigear on the Start in Asturias stage, and three days on the Asturias Startup Paradise stand.

South Summit 2024: Pitching Konfigear at La Nave


[MWC Barcelona](https://www.mwcbarcelona.com/) is sold as a mobile show. Walk the halls in 2024 and it was an AI show with phones attached. I started the year there with Konfigear — less to collect brochures than to see what the rest of the industry had decided was no longer optional.

I was there because [ASTUREX](https://www.asturex.org/) and [CEEI Asturias](https://www.ceei.es/) put a regional delegation on the floor: Asturias Startup Paradise next to the Spain Pavilion. That is the useful version of a trade fair. You do not wander 100,000 people hoping to get lucky. You stand with people who already know why you are in the building.

<figure class="story-figure">
  <img src="/images/yassine-ait-oufkir-mwc-2024-barcelona.jpg" alt="Yassine Ait Oufkir, founder of Konfigear, at Mobile World Congress 2024 in Barcelona between the UK and Spain flags" width="768" height="1024" loading="lazy" decoding="async" />
  <figcaption>MWC 2024, Fira Gran Via, Barcelona.</figcaption>
</figure>

<figure class="story-figure">
  <img src="/images/mwc-2024-barcelona-entrance-fira-gran-via.jpg" alt="Crowd of attendees outside the MWC 2024 entrance at Fira Barcelona Gran Via" width="768" height="1024" loading="lazy" decoding="async" />
  <figcaption>The plaza outside Fira Gran Via — MWC still looks like a city arriving at work.</figcaption>
</figure>

<figure class="story-figure">
  <img src="/images/mwc-2024-asturias-startup-paradise-pavilion.jpg" alt="Asturias Startup Paradise pavilion at MWC 2024, with ASTUREX, CEEI Asturias and SEKUENS branding" width="1024" height="1024" loading="lazy" decoding="async" />
  <figcaption>Asturias Startup Paradise — ASTUREX, CEEI Asturias, SEKUENS.</figcaption>
</figure>

<figure class="story-figure">
  <img src="/images/mwc-2024-spain-pavilion-barcelona.jpg" alt="Spain Pavilion at Mobile World Congress 2024 in Barcelona, viewed from above the hall" width="768" height="1024" loading="lazy" decoding="async" />
  <figcaption>The Spain Pavilion on the MWC floor.</figcaption>
</figure>

<figure class="story-figure">
  <img src="/images/mwc-2024-connected-industries-stand.jpg" alt="Connected Industries stage at MWC 2024 in Barcelona, lit in blue with presentation seating" width="1024" height="1024" loading="lazy" decoding="async" />
  <figcaption>Connected Industries — the part of the show that was no longer about handsets.</figcaption>
</figure>

I came back with a shorter list than I expected. AI was not a side stage. It was in every demo that mattered, including the industrial ones. For Konfigear that confirmed the same bet we started after Lisbon: configuration software that cannot reason about a product will look dated faster than the hardware around it. 2024 was for making that real, not announcing it.


Yassine Ait Oufkir at MWC 2024 in Barcelona — Konfigear with the Asturias delegation, and what a week of AI-heavy product demos changed in how we think about configuration.

MWC 2024: Konfigear at Mobile World Congress Barcelona


From 2012 to 2018 I ran a visualization practice through archi-service.ma. The work was interiors, exteriors, hotels, and the occasional civic façade — mostly in Morocco, mostly for people who could not read a plan the way I could.

Clients were not buying pictures. They were buying a room they could agree on before anyone spent money.

A floor plan is fluent if you have spent years inside one. For the client it is a set of lines that might become a house, or might become a disappointment. The meeting starts with everyone nodding at the same drawing and ends with three different buildings in three different heads. I learned that early, and I learned it the expensive way: revisions after the tiles were ordered, after the sofa was made, after the contractor had already framed the opening in the wrong place.

The render closed that gap. Not because it was pretty. Because it was specific. Once the light, the materials, and the furniture were in the same frame, the argument stopped being about whose imagination was right and started being about what to change.

### Light first

A villa in Agdal, 2015. Night. The door is closed. The house is already occupied.

<figure class="story-figure">
  <img src="/images/blog/archi-service/villa-agdal-night.jpg" alt="Night rendering of a modern villa entrance in Agdal, with warm interior light visible through floor-to-ceiling windows" width="3000" height="1400" loading="lazy" decoding="async" />
  <figcaption>Night exterior of a villa in Agdal, 2015. The argument is the threshold — you can already stand at the door.</figcaption>
</figure>

This is the shot I still trust. You do not need a walkthrough. You need to feel that the building has a temperature. Warm light on stone steps, a wooden door, the living room visible through glass: that is enough for a client to decide whether they want to live there. Daylight exteriors sell geometry. Night exteriors sell the life inside.

Most of the work was not this clean. It was kitchens, salons, hotels, showrooms, and a long list of apartments that will never have a plaque on the wall. The useful part was the same every time. Put the decision in a picture both people can point at.

### Two rooms, one country

Morocco has a design language that does not survive being treated as decoration. A riad salon that only quotes mashrabiya and low seating looks like a hotel brochure. A majlis that only quotes gold and chandeliers looks like a catalogue page. The job was to make the room feel inhabited — carved wood, a painting that belongs on that wall, landscape through glass — without turning heritage into costume.

<div class="story-gallery">
  <figure>
    <img src="/images/blog/archi-service/riad-marrakech-salon.jpg" alt="Interior rendering of a Moroccan salon in a Marrakech riad, with carved wood, low seating, and a Tbourida painting" width="3100" height="1780" loading="lazy" decoding="async" />
    <figcaption>A riad renovation in Marrakech, 2015. The salon has to read as Moroccan without becoming a set.</figcaption>
  </figure>
  <figure>
    <img src="/images/blog/archi-service/hunting-pavilion-majlis.jpg" alt="Interior rendering of a hunting-pavilion majlis with gold lighting, wood paneling, and landscape through glass" width="2800" height="1767" loading="lazy" decoding="async" />
    <figcaption>A hunting pavilion, 2015. Hospitality at a private scale — gold, wood, and the land outside the glass.</figcaption>
  </figure>
</div>

These were not style exercises. They were approval documents. A family looking at a riad renovation is not asking whether the renderer knows 3ds Max. They are asking whether they will still recognise themselves in the room after the builder is gone.

### A brand already in the room

Hospitality is a different meeting. The client already has a name, a standard, and a memory of other properties. You are not inventing a house. You are proposing a space that has to sit next to an existing brand without embarrassing it.

<figure class="story-figure">
  <img src="/images/blog/archi-service/sofitel-terrace.jpg" alt="Interior rendering of a Sofitel terrace restaurant with red booth seating, drum pendants, and glass opening onto palms" width="2800" height="1460" loading="lazy" decoding="async" />
  <figcaption>Sofitel terrace, 2016. Commercial interiors start with a brand already in the room.</figcaption>
</figure>

Civic work is stricter still. A façade for the Wilaya de Tanger has to read from the street, in daylight, to people who will never sit in a design review. There is no sofa to hide behind, and no evening lighting to make the materials forgiving.

<figure class="story-figure">
  <img src="/images/blog/archi-service/wilaya-tanger-facade.jpg" alt="Daytime exterior rendering of the Wilaya de Tanger façade and entrance" width="2400" height="1600" loading="lazy" decoding="async" />
  <figcaption>Façade study for the Wilaya de Tanger, 2016. The building has to make sense from the pavement.</figcaption>
</figure>

I do not miss the revision rounds. I do miss how quickly a good still could end an argument that a stack of elevations could not.

### The last rooms

By 2018 the work had narrowed. Fewer façades. More rooms treated as a single decision — furniture, materials, and lighting approved together, not in sequence. That is slower to model and faster to agree on.

<figure class="story-figure">
  <img src="/images/blog/archi-service/villa-living-room.jpg" alt="Interior rendering of a villa living room with a modular sofa, chessboard coffee table, and warm wood doors" width="4235" height="2600" loading="lazy" decoding="async" />
  <figcaption>A villa living room, 2018. Late in the period the furniture stopped being decoration and became part of the architecture.</figcaption>
</figure>

I founded Konfigear in 2014, so this practice did not end so the software company could begin. They ran in parallel. One was rooms. One was products. Both were the same problem: somebody is about to commit to something that does not exist yet, and a drawing is not enough.

I later learned the same lesson in a factory, in virtual reality. That is a different story. This one is simpler. For six years the product was a picture of a room. What it sold was agreement.


From 2012 to 2018 I ran a visualization practice in Morocco. The renders were the product. What they actually sold was agreement.

I Spent Six Years Rendering Rooms That Did Not Exist Yet


[Web Summit](https://websummit.com/) 2023 in Lisbon is still the largest room I have stood in as a founder. I was there with Konfigear, as a partner, on the Spanish Pavilion — talking to people who already sell configurable products and were trying to decide what AI actually changes in that work.

The pavilion exists because of the Asturias and Spanish trade stack behind us: [CEEI Asturias](https://www.ceei.es/), [ASTUREX](https://www.asturex.org/), [ICEX](https://www.icex.es/), and [Cluster TIC Asturias](https://clustertic.net/). They do not just book a stand. They put you next to operators who will tell you, in ten minutes, whether your product is a demo or a tool.

<figure class="story-figure">
  <img src="/images/yassine-ait-oufkir-konfigear-web-summit-2023-lisbon.jpg" alt="Yassine Ait Oufkir, founder of Konfigear, wearing a Web Summit 2023 Partner badge in the Lisbon arena" width="1024" height="1024" loading="lazy" decoding="async" />
  <figcaption>Web Summit 2023, Lisbon — Konfigear, Partner badge. <a href="https://www.linkedin.com/posts/aitoufkiir_websummit2023-ai-innovation-activity-7130857062032392192-F_M-" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">Original post on LinkedIn</a>.</figcaption>
</figure>

<figure class="story-figure">
  <img src="/images/web-summit-2023-spain-pavilion-delegation-lisbon.jpg" alt="Spanish delegation group photo at the Spain Pavilion, Web Summit 2023 in Lisbon, including Konfigear" width="1024" height="1024" loading="lazy" decoding="async" />
  <figcaption>The Spanish Pavilion delegation at Web Summit 2023.</figcaption>
</figure>

<figure class="story-figure">
  <img src="/images/web-summit-2023-spain-pavilion-networking.jpg" alt="Conversations at the Spain Pavilion green-wall stand during Web Summit 2023 in Lisbon" width="1024" height="1024" loading="lazy" decoding="async" />
  <figcaption>On the floor at the Spain Pavilion — the useful part of the week.</figcaption>
</figure>

The conversations kept landing in the same place: configuration is still a reasoning problem. A CPQ system that only stores options is not enough when the customer wants a product that does not exist yet. After Lisbon I started putting more AI into how Konfigear builds those paths — not as a slogan on a slide, as part of the configurator itself.


Yassine Ait Oufkir at Web Summit 2023 in Lisbon — representing Konfigear at the Spanish Pavilion, and why we started putting more AI into CPQ and product configuration.

Web Summit 2023: Konfigear at the Spanish Pavilion


The first [GITEX Africa](https://www.gitexafrica.com/) ran in Marrakech at the end of May 2023. I was there on the 10X START UP Stage, talking about the years we spent building the company out of Asturias — not a product demo, a timeline.

That story only exists because of the people who made the Spanish chapter possible: [CEEI Asturias](https://www.ceei.es/), [ICEX](https://www.icex.es/), and the Spanish Chamber of Commerce in Casablanca. They put us in a room with operators who were already building, not just visiting a booth.

<figure class="story-figure">
  <img src="/images/yassine-ait-oufkir-gitex-africa-2023.jpg" alt="Ait Oufkir Yassine on the 10X START UP Stage at GITEX Africa 2023 in Marrakech, presenting the Asturias startup journey" width="1024" height="1024" loading="lazy" decoding="async" />
  <figcaption>GITEX Africa 2023, 10X START UP Stage, Marrakech. <a href="https://www.linkedin.com/posts/aitoufkiir_gitexafrica-asturias-startupjourney-activity-7070360735112912896-lNF5" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">Original post on LinkedIn</a>.</figcaption>
</figure>

Trade shows are noisy. The useful part is rarely the keynote. It is the conversation afterwards — the founder who has the same distribution problem, the partner who already works the market you are about to enter. I left with a few of those, which is the only metric that still matters three years later.


On the 10X START UP Stage in Marrakech I told the Asturias chapter of the company — and left with better conversations than a slide deck usually buys.

GITEX Africa 2023


I have stood on Jebel Toubkal four times. Same mountain, different seasons, different versions of myself. North Africa's highest peak is not exotic if you grew up within reach of the High Atlas — it is a recurring appointment.

### September 2012

First time up. I was young enough that the difficulty felt like a story I would tell later, not something that might stop me. Waterfalls on the approach, rock underfoot, the slow realisation that the summit is mostly patience.

![Toubkal, September 2012](/images/blog/toubkal/2012-09.jpg)

### October 2014

Two years later the ridges still held snow in the shaded couloirs while the trail stayed dry. Clear sky, thin air, other hikers ahead and behind. I knew the rhythm better by then: early start, steady pace, less drama than the first climb and more attention to the ground.

![Toubkal, October 2014](/images/blog/toubkal/2014-10.jpg)

### April 2015

A longer stretch in the mountains — early April into the following days. Snow still clung to the high slopes. Sitting on the rocks at the top with a pack, poles, and a bottle of Aïn Saïss half-frozen felt less like a conquest and more like returning somewhere I already understood.

![Toubkal, April 2015](/images/blog/toubkal/2015-04.jpg)

### November 2016

Winter conditions. Deep snow on the ascent, cold shadow in the valley, sun only on the upper ridges. Harder gear, slower steps, the same summit waiting at the end. Four climbs in, Toubkal had stopped being a checkbox. It was a place I kept choosing.

![Toubkal, November 2016](/images/blog/toubkal/2016-11.jpg)

I will go back. Mountains like this do not stay finished.


Four climbs of Jebel Toubkal between 2012 and 2016 — short notes and a photo from each ascent.

Four Summits of Toubkal


Here is a workflow I have watched in some version at nearly every custom apparel business I have visited.

A club wants twenty jerseys. Someone in sales mocks up a design — often in Illustrator, sometimes in a web tool, occasionally in PowerPoint. It goes to the customer as a flat image. The customer says the blue is wrong. Round two. The customer says the sponsor logo should be higher. Round three. Eventually: approved.

Then the approved file goes to production, and somebody spends the next hour rebuilding it.

Not adjusting it. **Rebuilding it.** Correct colour profile, correct separations, correct placement on the actual pattern pieces, correct sizing per garment size, names and numbers laid out from a roster that arrived as a spreadsheet with inconsistent capitalisation.

That hour is the real cost of a custom order, and almost nobody prices it in.

<figure class="story-figure story-figure--portrait">
  <img src="/images/yassine-ait-oufkir-ctco-print-lyon-client.jpg" alt="Ait Oufkir Yassine presenting Konfiwear at a custom apparel stand in Lyon" width="792" height="1024" loading="lazy" decoding="async" />
  <figcaption>On the floor at CTCO Lyon, where production teams describe the same approval-to-prepress gap in their own workflows.</figcaption>
</figure>

### Why the mockup and the print file are different objects

The mockup exists to close the sale. It is optimised for looking convincing on a screen. It does not need to know that the garment is cut from six pattern pieces, that the sublimation transfer needs bleed past the seam allowance, or that the customer's RGB blue does not exist in the ink set you are running.

The print file exists to drive a machine. It has to know all of those things.

They are made by different people, in different software, for different purposes. So the handoff between them is manual by construction — and manual handoffs are where errors enter.

The errors are not evenly distributed either. Most of them are invisible until the press runs:

- A logo that looked crisp at screen resolution is 90 DPI when scaled to actual chest width
- A colour approved on a customer's uncalibrated laptop is two shades off the club's brand blue
- A design placed near a seam that shifts when the panel is cut
- A roster where "MCDONALD" and "McDonald" are two different players

You find these on press, on the garment, after you have consumed material and machine time. Then you eat the reprint, or you ship it and eat the complaint.

### The usual fixes, and why they only half work

**Hire better prepress people.** This works, and it is expensive, and it does not scale. Your throughput is now capped by how many skilled operators you can hire in your city. It also means your best technical people spend their day on repetitive rebuilds instead of the genuinely hard jobs.

**Lock down the templates.** Restrict customers to a few fixed layouts. This reduces errors and it reduces orders, because the reason people buy custom is that they want something specific. You have solved a production problem by making the product worse.

**Add approval steps.** More sign-offs catch more errors, and every sign-off adds a day. In teamwear, where the order has to arrive before the season starts, added days lose deals outright.

Each of these treats the symptom. The disease is that the file the customer approved is not the file that goes to production.

<figure class="story-figure">
  <img src="/images/konfiwear%20stand%20in%20berlin%20fespa.jfif" alt="The Konfiwear customization software stand at FESPA Berlin" width="819" height="819" loading="lazy" decoding="async" />
  <figcaption>Demonstrating the customer-to-production workflow at FESPA Berlin.</figcaption>
</figure>

### Closing the gap instead of managing it

The alternative is to make the customer's design _be_ the production file — same object, two views.

That means the customer designs on the real garment: actual pattern geometry, actual print areas, actual constraints. Colours are constrained to what you can genuinely produce, so an approved colour is a producible colour. Logo placement is validated against seams and safe zones as the customer moves it. Minimum resolution is enforced at upload, not discovered at output. Rosters are structured data, not a pasted spreadsheet.

Then the order produces the print-ready output automatically — separations, bleed, per-size scaling, correct profile for DTG, sublimation, screen print or embroidery.

This is what we built Konfiwear to do, so I am obviously not a neutral party. But the principle stands regardless of whose software you use: **if a customer can approve something you cannot produce, your workflow has a manual repair step in it, and you are paying for that step on every single order.**

### What it changes

The hour of rebuild goes away. That is the obvious one, and it is not the important one.

The important one is what happens to the front of the process. When the customer is looking at their actual garment rather than an approximation, the approval rounds collapse — usually to one. The uncertainty that caused round two and round three was never really about the design. It was the customer not trusting that what they saw was what they would get.

Custom apparel buyers do not abandon orders because of price. They abandon because they are not sure, and the cost of a wrong order of 200 jerseys is high enough that not-sure means not-yet.

Remove the doubt at the point of design, and you get the production saving as a side effect.

### A question worth asking your own team

Not "how do we make prepress faster?" but:

_How many hours a week does this business spend converting files a customer already approved into files a machine can actually run — and what would we do with those hours instead?_

Most operations I ask have never counted it. The number is usually larger than they expect.

<div class="story-gallery story-gallery--wide">
  <figure>
    <img src="/images/ctco%20print%20expo.jpg" alt="The main entrance to the CTCO Print expo at Eurexpo Lyon" width="1024" height="512" loading="lazy" decoding="async" />
    <figcaption>CTCO Print at Eurexpo Lyon.</figcaption>
  </figure>
  <figure>
    <img src="/images/belin%20fespa.jpg" alt="Visitors arriving at Messe Berlin for FESPA" width="1024" height="512" loading="lazy" decoding="async" />
    <figcaption>FESPA at Messe Berlin.</figcaption>
  </figure>
</div>


Your customer approved a flat mockup. Your production team received something they have to rebuild by hand. That gap is where the margin goes.

The Expensive Part of Custom Apparel Isn't Design. It's Prepress.


Before I wrote a line of software, I designed factories.

At DAHER I worked on the layout of a 14,000 m² aeronautics plant. Not on paper — in virtual reality, with full 3D simulation. We put on headsets and walked the production lines before the ground was broken. We watched parts move between stations. We found the aisle that was too narrow for the transport we had specified, and the workstation where an operator would have been reaching across a moving line every ninety seconds.

<figure class="story-figure">
  <img src="/images/usine%20daher%203D%20VR.png" alt="3D simulation of the 12,000 m² composite manufacturing plant designed for Daher Aerospace" width="1187" height="708" loading="lazy" decoding="async" />
  <figcaption>Full composite plant simulation of 12,000 m² for Daher Aerospace, 2016–2017. <a href="https://www.linkedin.com/posts/aitoufkiir_full-composite-plant-simulation-of-12-000m2-share-6347018886331789313-lDko/" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">Original post on LinkedIn</a>.</figcaption>
</figure>

<figure class="story-figure">
  <img src="/images/using%20daher%203D%20vr%20salle%20blanche.png" alt="Side-by-side comparison of the 3D factory simulation and the finished clean-room assembly lines" width="1184" height="659" loading="lazy" decoding="async" />
  <figcaption>The same clean-room lines in simulation and after construction — the model became the built factory.</figcaption>
</figure>

All of it before a single wall went up.

### The technology was not the interesting part

VR was the novelty, and the novelty wore off in about a week. What did not wear off was what it did to the meetings.

Before, a layout review was a group of experienced people arguing over a 2D drawing. The production manager had one picture in his head. The safety officer had a different one. The industrial engineer had a third. Everyone was fluent in reading plans, and everyone was still reading a slightly different building.

After, we were all standing in the same room. Not metaphorically — the same simulated room, at the same scale, looking at the same aisle. The argument stopped being about whose mental model was right and started being about what to do. That is a categorically different conversation, and it is faster by an order of magnitude.

The value was not visualization. The value was **shared reference**.

### The same problem, in a completely different industry

Years later I was looking at eCommerce product pages for configurable goods — modular furniture, industrial profiles, custom uniforms — and it was the same failure in a different costume.

A customer wants a sofa in a specific fabric, in a specific configuration, for a specific wall. The website offers eight swatch thumbnails and a photo of a different sofa. The customer builds a picture in their head. The manufacturer has a different picture. Nobody finds out they disagreed until the thing arrives in a box.

That gap has a name in retail: returns. In B2B it shows up as quote revisions, sample rounds, and deals that quietly stall because the buyer is not confident enough to sign.

I had spent years watching that exact gap get closed on a factory floor. It seemed obvious that the same tooling belonged on the buying side.

That is why I founded Konfigear in 2019.

### What actually transfers

Not everything from industrial simulation is useful in commerce. Three things are.

**Scale and constraint have to be real.** A factory simulation that ignores turning radii is worse than no simulation, because it produces confident wrong answers. The same is true of a product configurator that lets a customer build something the factory cannot make. If the tool permits an impossible configuration, you have not removed uncertainty — you have moved it downstream to the person who has to phone the customer back. Rule-based configuration is not a feature. It is the difference between a demo and a system.

**Fidelity matters exactly as much as the decision requires.** We did not photorealistically render that plant. We did not need to. We needed accurate geometry and accurate distances. Commerce is the opposite — a buyer choosing a fabric needs the colour to be right far more than they need the polygon count to be high. Pantone accuracy beats ray tracing. Knowing which kind of fidelity your decision actually depends on saves an enormous amount of work.

**The output has to be usable downstream.** The plant model was not a picture. It fed real planning. A configurator that produces a pretty preview and then hands production a screenshot has solved the easy half of the problem. What the customer approved has to become what manufacturing receives, automatically, or you have just added a step.

That last one took us the longest to get right, and it is the one customers care about most.

### Where this ends up

Twelve years on, the platform runs for more than 200 organizations across 20-plus countries — industrial profile systems, solar mounting, furniture, medical equipment, and, through Konfiwear, custom apparel.

<div class="story-gallery">
  <figure>
    <img src="/images/yassine-ait-oufkir-ceei-asturias.jpg" alt="Ait Oufkir Yassine with the Asturias CEEI team" width="706" height="650" loading="lazy" decoding="async" />
    <figcaption>With the Asturias CEEI team in Spain, where Konfigear is now headquartered.</figcaption>
  </figure>
  <figure>
    <img src="/images/yassine-ait-oufkir-icex.jpg" alt="Ait Oufkir Yassine meeting with the ICEX Invest in Spain team" width="1024" height="1024" loading="lazy" decoding="async" />
    <figcaption>Meeting the ICEX Invest in Spain team as the company expanded internationally.</figcaption>
  </figure>
</div>

The products could not be less alike. The underlying problem is identical every time: somebody is about to commit to something that does not exist yet, and they cannot picture it well enough to be sure.

Buyers do not usually walk away from configurable products because of price. They walk away because they cannot picture what will actually arrive, and the cost of being wrong feels higher than the cost of doing nothing.

Removing that uncertainty before the order is placed is the entire job. It was the job on the factory floor too. I just did not realise at the time that I was learning it.


Before I wrote software, I laid out an aeronautics plant in virtual reality. The most valuable thing it produced was not a better factory — it was better arguments.

Archive

2026